|
1
|
- Avi Nachmany
- Director of Research, Strategic Insight
|
|
2
|
- A challenging year: assumptions to make?
- Worldwide, from “home bias” preferences to int’l diversification; will
it last through the stock markets price corrections?
- Asset allocation “religion” greater prominence, implications
- 2H ‘07 Value to Growth rotation – 2008 correction impact?
- Pricing, fees, distribution trends, and more.
|
|
3
|
|
|
4
|
- Opportunity: Over the next 5 years, mutual fund assets in Asia could
expand from $1.7 trillion to $6-$8 trillion (assuming normalized
economic growth)
- Future is Here: In 2007, net flows to stock and bond fund in Asia ~ $450
billion; annual flows might rise to $1 trillion in 2012
- Insatiable Demand: To succeed, local distributors must partner with
quality investment managers in Europe, America, and Australia
- SI Resources: new in-depth study augments the suite of research
resources we already offer nearly 70 of the world’s most dynamic
investment and distribution firms, helping them build their businesses
in Asia and worldwide.
|
|
5
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
8
|
- Assets gains: ~$1.8 trillion ’07, $1.6 trillion ’06
- Equity investors returns: 16.4% ’06; ~10% ’07
- US growth style outperform value in ’07 by 12%, and flow rotation to
growth was in place 2H07
- Int’l Equity: ‘07 Int’l active fund flows ~ $180 B (US active fund
negative); same pattern as 2006 (of course, many US funds grew, but
other shrunk)
- 29% = int’l equity fund share of equity fund industry sales in 2007, 28%
in 2006; will increase more…
- Fund-of-funds:’07 FoFs net inflows ~ $140 B
- Bond funds: ’07 bond fund flows ~
$140 billion; gains in FoFs, wraps, US Dollar play, specialized
strategies; small impact of credit market turmoil
- Money market fund flows: ~ $600B YTD.
|
|
9
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
15
|
- By their actions, investors worldwide have shown more confidence in the
mutual fund vehicle than some of us believe, but caution is evidenced
also and many legacy managers failed to participate
- Fund Selection Units and other sales practice changes opened doors to
smaller, alpha-generating investment firms (“centers of excellence”) at
expense of larger managers.
|
|
16
|
|
|
17
|
- “Million Dollar Baby”, pre-assembled advice / asset allocation focus,
greater use of “screened, selected” funds (Fund-Selection-Units),
fee-based pricing, “need based” packaging - all eyes on pre-empting conflicts and
keeping politics away…
|
|
18
|
- Making choices in our lives based on “past experiences” is common, if
not innate
- Buying another Lexus, Godiva, or Jimmy Choo makes sense
- Buying the “hottest” (stock, fund, style) generally does not
- The US financial industry is transitioning towards offering more
selections featuring “asset allocation by default”.
|
|
19
|
- “Investing as Consumers” dilemma, the Herculean task of investor
education, and other drivers of the explosive growth of “Assembled
Advice” and asset allocation processes
- Because of fiduciary concerns, “Assembled Advice” will increasingly dominate
financial advisors’ / DC plan recommendations
- For example, a prudent higher allocation to int’l equity funds (currently
29% of equity fund overall assets); more to come (a move away from
“home-bias” in Europe, Canada, Japan …)
- Or, adding to bond fund exposure during flat yield-curve periods.
|
|
20
|
- Funds-of-funds: 2007 flows ~$140B; ’06 $110B; ’05 $80B
- Fund wrap inflows rising: $85-90B in ’07 flows, up from ~$60B in ’06
- Asset allocation programs’ net inflows > 2/3 of all open-end
stock/bond fund net inflows
- How can you participate in the restructuring of the wealth management
process towards asset allocation, evidenced everywhere?
|
|
21
|
- Huge sales gains by FoFs, “Wraps”, and the like; more to come due to
U.S.’s 2006 Pension Protection Act; marketplace forces a transition to “asset
allocation by default”
- “Choice within constraints, freedom within limits, is what enables the
little fish to imagine a host of marvelous possibilities” (Barry
Schwartz, The Paradox of Choice: Why More is Less, Page 236 and the
closing sentence)
- Using a “total wealth” frame of thinking, instead of zeroing in on
individual investments (for which perceived risks are amplified) lead to
better long-term decisions (as suggested by Daniel Kahneman, recent
Nobel Prize winner); funds-of-funds or “wrapped” investments help to
keep investors more in “total wealth” frame of mind…
|
|
22
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
26
|
- ’07 flows ~ $240 B; foreign equity allocations to further rise from
still-too-low ~29% of assets; is a 50:50 allocation hyperbole? Will it
settle instead at 65:35?
- Int’l style-box mindset (+ Emerging Markets) + innovative strategies + FoFs
trigger additional sales due to refined asset allocation
- Away from “home-bias” (worldwide); trailing returns, US Dollar long-term
trend favorable
- International fund inflows stay high; trend strong enough to overcome
temporary stock market volatility or Dollar (temporary?) rebound.
|
|
27
|
- A “Flat World” for wealth opportunities (and risks) dictates a greater
exposure to intellectual capital outside your home country, especially
for long-term oriented retirement portfolios
- Beyond (cyclical) nature of investors chasing yesterday’s winners
(lately, int’l equity funds…); the desire for global diversification is
here to stay
- Such secular demand could serve as a counterweight during periodic
reversals in return-chasing investor flows.
|
|
28
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
38
|
- Asset allocation requires (core) bond fund exposure even in today’s
yield curve; also for wealth protection, economic and US Dollar anxiety
- Bond fund NAV risk (from rising interest rates) lower than generally assumed,
since average duration of bond funds very short – 4 years for taxable, 6
years for Munis
- Plus, $5+ trillion in cash looking for a solution; as cash income less
than inflation
- Bond fund ’07 flows ~$140B, ’08 demand persists.
|
|
39
|
- Income, dividend fund sales, a story to tell every day; helping brokers
engage
- MMF / Banks $5 trillion+ in cash
- Strategic Income, Total Return Bond fund, Core-Plus (for asset
allocation), Int’l bonds, other innovative strategies: unrealized sales
promise.
|
|
40
|
|
|
41
|
- Equity funds: funds-of-funds with diverse strategies, international,
clone funds to manage capacity, quant, global real estate, commodity
real return, other non-correlated strategies, institutional stand-alone
funds, many sector / innovative ETFs, etc.
- Bond: international bond, floating rate, TIPS, multi-sector, short
duration, cash+, and other strategies; some expansion in bond ETFs.
|
|
42
|
- Increasing demand for funds; accelerating shifts from stocks to “managed
assets” (funds, SMAs, ETFs, FoFs, etc.)
- Fund expansion globally, inflows accelerating in Asia (~ $450B in 2007!)
- Institutionalization of fund selection (FSUs)
- Further transition toward “fee-based”
- SMAs help fund managers cross-pollinate
- Hedge fund boom, but for individuals, mutual fund investments “not-fully
correlated to market” only slow gain (~$5B in ’07 flows, same as ’06; in
market neutral, 130:30); recent slowdown as a result of a reality-check.
|
|
43
|
- Beyond just selling 1-fund-at-a-time: how to participate (distinctively)
in assembled advice, asset allocation programs and industry transition
- 2008: What’s next for value funds? Growth-style sales recovery for real
this time, despite January?
- Will high demand for international equity last in 2008?
- Bond fund opportunities in steepening yield curve
- ETF: stock/sector bets vs. mutual fund substitution?
- VAs: attracting new customers, retirement income reality
- Closed-end fund IPOs: ~28B ‘07, but window now closed
- My Company investment process: understanding institutional analytics,
building internal consensus (CIO, portfolio managers, sales, marketing,
etc.), and articulating externally to clients.
|
|
44
|
- My view: for now, 80% of ETF use by individuals represents substitution
of stocks / SMAs, and not of actively-managed mutual funds; but retail
use of ETFs and ETF “wraps” materializing slowly
- Inst’l and retail: ETFs aggregate 2007 net flows ~$150 billion more than
twice the $69 B in ’06 vs. $54B in both ’04 and ’05
- Bond/Currency ETFs hold only $38 B in assets, but growing; $15 billion
2007 inflows
- When will active ETFs become reality? Does this matter? Funds-of-ETFs
use?
|
|
45
|
- Retail: mostly stock / SMA substitution, asset allocation building
block; completion strategy (when no small cap SMA or in-house product);
core-satellite (passive Large Cap core and non-ETF active “satellites”);
new or small account implementation; strategic sector bets; commodities
- Institutional: cash equitization (liquid ETF holdings instead of cash) /
futures substitute; risk management (add / remove duration risk to
portfolio); portfolio “building blocks”; portfolio hedging/shorts;
manager transition
- Emerging themes, and future: commodity/currency, leveraged/inverse ETFs,
US sub-sector, “fundamental” index-based, additional bond ETFs;
value/growth of regional int’l funds; int’l sector; lifecycle;
funds-of-ETFs; ETF of ETFs, the retirement market, replicating active
funds using attribution analysis? Using ETFs to wash away capital gains?
Will truly active ETFs be allowed? Will they be cheaper than today’s
active funds?
|
|
46
|
- Advisory fee breakpoints, economies of scale; (fee waiving at times, but
less than 7% of funds changed contractual advisory fees in ’04, ’05,
’06, ‘07)
- Consistency (harmonization) of breakpoints: funds vs. VAs and throughout
one’s fund line
- Performance-based fee asymmetries
- TA fee benchmarking, small accounts’ impact
- Retained advisory fees in sub-advised funds
- Fund closing and 12b-1 fees
- Advisory contract renewal other themes.
|
|
47
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
50
|
- Stock market lingering concerns; equity funds for the “long-term”; relative
return winners; higher dividends; growth style rebound delayed?; will
tax management re-surface?
- Bond funds: sustained demand, despite
flat yield curve 1H07, ~$140B in ’07 flows!
- “Pre-assembled advice” investing continuing
- International fund sales gains persist
- Tactical asset allocation, long-short, 130:30, and other clear-eyed
strategies?
|
|
51
|
- Past bear market did not change long-term investment optimism in US ;
perception of most – risks are only in the short term, rewards are
certain in the long term
- Equity funds purchased for strategic asset allocation; unless and until
there’s a long period of reduced personal confidence (not just NAVs!) or
the US becomes a nation of pessimists
- But, re-dedication to asset allocation.
|
|
52
|
|
|
53
|
- A compelling reason to buy, and a compelling reason to redeem; funds are
not commodities….
- Style-adherent risk-adjusted past return excellence – a magnet for
inflows; winners grow, losers shrink
- Take your pick: Morningstar Stars, Lipper Leaders, S&P Stars, or just
3-year simple look back – any such measure correlates well to flows.
|
|
54
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
56
|
- “Seattle” (top left) vs. “Miami” (bottom right) positioning on
risk-return grid: which to buy for “win probability” for next 3-5-10
years? Not just looking back, and “investing as consumers”
- “Stars”: predictability, or lack thereof
- Dynamic rebalancing away from “hot” style; toward an investment process,
not just look-back ranking excellence (within a “fuzzy-border” style
box).
|
|
57
|
- Financial advisors control present and future fund distribution
- Accumulation for retirement key; how soon (or if) “distribution” phase?
- Will “outcome-based” dialogue becomes a common reality?
- A continuing transition toward fee-based relationships
- The newer standards of due diligence
- Institutionalized selection and B/D Investment Analysts’ expanding
powers.
|
|
58
|
|
|
59
|
- From “1 idea at-a-time” to “assembled advice”
- Many financial advisors are moving away from previous primary focus on
investment “discovery”; more often, attractive funds are now identified
by Investment Specialists (Fund Selection Units), not the advisor; and
allocation / rebalancing done by Investment Committee, freeing advisors
to do other things…
- Instead, advisors concentrate on needs of their wealthier clients, and
offer specialized advice (real estate, trust, education, insurance,
etc.); focusing on “total financial life”; replication (understanding
their best clients, searching for similar prospects), aggregation
(capture more of best clients’ household wealth), validation (investment
choices, beliefs, concerns); FAs need help building a business.
- A new dialogue: income-at-retirement vs. product-focus?
|
|
60
|
- Institutionalization of fund selection: evaluation process, information
flow, wholesaling structure implication; tomorrows’ wholesalers trained
today
- Retirement income; will such “need based” discussion become industry
“new language?”; fluctuating personal risk horizons; and what “financial
freedom” means
- Overcoming brokers’ fatigue (away from “exciting” ideas and to “asset
allocation” makes story “boring”)
- Fast gains in fund “wraps” to persist
- Rollovers: large and growing; FoFs and rollovers
- Keeping fund directors within their comfort zones via active engagement,
education; trustees’ rising interest in understanding changing
distribution and fund pricing landscape and its long-term implications
- Expansion opportunities in Asia, Europe.
|
|
61
|
- Income-at-retirement (pre-mature) reality; but benefits of
“outcome-based” dialogue
- Fluctuating Personal-Risk-Time-Horizons
- Financial freedom for some = opportunities
- Financial freedom for others = no financial fears
- Income-at-retirement is a very different concept for these two groups.
|
|
62
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
65
|
- Commissionable “A” down to possibly 15% of B/D sales (some exceptions);
and “perfecting breakpoints” is not an exact science
- Star Blind: time for Morningstar to stop panelizing “A” shares due to
their (rarely charged) loads
- “C” shares 13-15% overall B/D sales (higher among some B/Ds’ retail
lines); automatic conversions (SEC’s buzz?)
- “B” shares falling to 3% of sales, down from 25% a few years back; “Bs”
rapidly liquidating
|
|
66
|
- Pricing dichotomy national BDs vs. others
- e.g., Merrill Lynch: Retail A/B/C (60% level-load), Retirement Platforms
(mostly NAV), and Fee-Based (NAV)
- But among some fin’l planners, regional BDs, some front-load business
sustainable since this is most attractive to ‘buy-and-hold’ (AG Edwards,
ED Jones evolution too?)
- Overall, transition to fee-based, externalized (non-fund) fees for
advice.
|
|
67
|
- Past: no major pricing modifications by fund managers considered leaders
/ trend setters for equity or longer duration bond funds (except some
fine-tuning…)
- ’08 Watch for: will UMA activity at Smith Barney, Merrill, ED Jones may
unleash a wave of new inst’l share classes (no 12b-1, 10 bp Sub-TA only);
but lower fund fees does not mean lower expenses to investors as overlay
fees high (and in after-tax $)
- SEC Rule 12b-1 actions?
|
|
68
|
- Most retirement business comes at 25 bp / no 12b-1 fee share classes
- American Funds control the great majority of this segment; note that its
effective total expense ratio (before 12b-1) is just 0.41% of fund
assets
- 12b-1 fee 0.50% R-share demand is evidenced but growing only slowly;
little activity at 0.75% and 1.00% 12b-1 R share classes (exc. Am.
Funds)
- Exc. Am. Funds: Only 7 managers with R-shares whose 12b-1 fees are
~0.50% garnered $200 million or more in ‘07 net inflows within such
funds; only 10 such funds gained > $100 MM in ’07 flows.
|
|
69
|
- Set up a customizable e-mail Daily Alert of all Fund / VA SEC filing changes
you care about via www.SimfundFiling.com
- Instant link to Latest Prospectus and its Key Data
- Weekly synopsis: all new SEC filings
- Fund and VA detailed fee data; subadvisory fees (Simfund)
- Research library on-call (Annuity Insight.com, Sionline.com).
|
|
70
|
- Most B/D sales at NAV within a platform, esp. among national B/Ds, large
planner firms
- In Key Accounts – from one-third to 100% of sales within the screened
list
- Selling by mixing science and art: transition from legacy, relationship
wholesaling, to a new institutional process and culture
- Yet range and diversity of FAs; wholesaling coverage continues to be
very important
- See FSU Checklist in 2-07 issue of SI’s Windows report.
|
|
71
|
- Same review process throughout product lines due to merging of
investment analyst units: mutual funds, VAs, SMAs, retirement, 529,
closed-end, and in Unified Accounts…
- Fee-based pricing puts more power in hands of investment analysts within
distributors
- Analysts’ interest in unknown managers
- Responding to this trend, fund managers intensify review of FSU
engagement process and people, and expand their teams
- In the long-term, this also has investment strategy implications.
|
|
72
|
- A small number of FSU teams control a high % of your sales opportunities
– must invest time in getting to know them;
- Articulate investment process, internally and externally, and expand
role of competitive analysts (w/in sales unit) to cover FSU needs
- Product development, investment risk control, CIO and management
considerations
- What data to share with B/D investment analysts? How and how often? Proactively?
- Critical for company to provide funding, build internal team skills,
resources.
|
|
73
|
- Within your key accounts, how well do you understand Fund Selection Unit
(FSU) methodology, matrix (anticipate, reach out)
- Peer group confusion: Morningstar, Lipper, or customized peer group
- Helping FSUs beyond just articulating your investment process
- Support: the importance of FSU to the investment analysts’ own
organization (which may still just focus on legacy-type sales…)
|
|
74
|
- Transition to asset allocation vs. “story” sales; how to overcome my
brokers’ fatigue
- Identifying quality, capacity in int’l equity funds; what if their sales
rise to 40-50% of total equity fund sales?
- Unique bond funds to add value to FA advice?
- Identify interesting asset allocation funds, processes; role of flexible
funds, global funds, funds-of-funds; long-only funds as building blocks
vs. long-short vs. non-correlated funds...
|
|
75
|
- Business: Do I offer the funds investors buy elsewhere? Timely news
about MyList of such funds, managers; limited capacity funds, partial closing;
new unique funds, and where they fit
- Investments: PM changes, investment policies, portfolio data updates
(what, how, and how often)? fees (absolute, relative, peer group, and
timely updates)
- How high is The Wall, Business vs. Investments?
- Quality, timeliness of investment managers’ response, when needed;
helping you (build, strengthen, protect) beyond just articulating
investment process.
|
|
76
|
- Past-performance (which) methodology: return, risk, time horizon
- Peer group confusion: Morningstar, Lipper, customized peer group, stated
index, other?
- What is short-term measurement period? Long-term? How much tolerance of
under-performance?
- Forward looking: buy-sell decision, culture, compensation, training
- Monitors pricing; “C” vs. “A” vs. “R” vs. “I”; 12b-1?; fee benchmarking;
emerging solution for National BDs: no-12b-1 fee, low sub-TA, and no
other revenue sharing.
|
|
77
|
|
|
78
|
- VA Guaranteed Minimum Withdrawal
Benefits (GMWBs) main sales driver; more lifetime and spousal versions available
- ’06-07 sales above those in prior
years; but net flows flat and modest
- Inflows of note: funds-of-funds;
int’l equity and bond funds with diverse strategies, selected Multi-Cap
Growth, small/mid-cap, natural resources, intermediate bond, TIPS
- Equity Indexed Annuities’ (EIAs) rising compliance demands hurt their
sales ’06-07.
|
|
79
|
|
|
80
|
- Overall sales rising but data shows no corresponding gains in net flows
- Asset allocation funds-of-funds’ growth accelerated, and interest
emerged in target maturity FOFs; ~$39B of FOF annual flows implies over
$45 billion in sales (possibly 30% of total sales, and higher in some
sectors)
- Master feeder formats adding VIT portfolios
- Consolidations of sub-advised platforms continue.
|
|
81
|
|
|
82
|
- Attractive profit retention even after outsourcing investment management
- Multi-manager diversification
- Flexibility in replacing under-performing managers, and pricing power
- Allows adding of brand name investment managers
- Ability to add a unique investment approach
- Superior performance (return / risk)
- Other (e.g., access to distribution).
|
|
83
|
- Performance, based on strong Morningstar Ratings, Lipper Scores…
attractive 3-year return / risk record a prerequisite…
- Style discipline important for hedging, asset allocation management…
insurers, investment analysts count on style-purity, well articulated
investment process within the style box…
- Fewer opportunities in large cap funds; capacity-driven need for small
cap, int’l funds, alternative strategies.
|
|
84
|
- US mutual funds will continue to grow unless bottom falls out; ~$13
trillion now, $30 trillion next decade; similar asset trends, and even faster
growth in Asia; yet ’08 a challenge
- Expansion opportunities for alpha-generating funds with open capacity
- To grow and defend what you have built, you need to increase learning
consciousness of others in firm, since you have no time to teach, or
learn yourself. Strategic Insight
and its 65+ associates can help, as we have already done for over 21
years.
|
|
85
|
|
|
86
|
- Simfund Databases: Funds, VAs, and Soon Asia and Europe
- SI On Line.com
- SimFund Filing.com
- Strategic Insight Global.com
- Annuity Insight.com
- Strategic Insight 212.944.4455 Avi@sionline.com
|